Beipaiosaurus was covered in the simplest known feathers

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed ResearchBeipaiosaurus was among the strangest of dinosaurs. It looked like a fusion of body parts taken from several other species and united in the unlikeliest of proportions. It had a stocky body, long arms adorned with massive claws, a long neck topped by an incongruously small head, and a beaked mouth. Bizarre as this cocktail of features is, it's the animal skin that has currently warrants attention.

i-aaf414cbcdfd8eb8ed0796d1e5614633-Beipaosaurus.jpgFossils of Beipaiosaurus include impressions of its skin and these clearly show long, broad filaments clumped around its head, neck, rump and tail. They are feathers, but most unusual ones. Traces of feathers have been found on other dinosaurs (including the infamous Velociraptor) and they come in a variety of shapes and forms. But all are composite structures consisting of several slender filaments that either sprout from a single base or branch off a central stem.

Beipaiosaurus was also covered in some of these complex feathers, but it had other plumes that were far simpler. Each of these was a single, unbranched, hollow filament - exactly the sort of structure that palaeontologists had predicted as the first step in the evolution of feathers.

Until now, their existence was merely hypothetical - this is the first time that any have actually been found in a fossil. Other, more advanced stages in feather evolution have been described, so Beipaiosaurus provides the final piece in a series of structures that takes us from simple filaments to the more advanced feathers of other dinosaurs to the complex quills that keep modern birds aloft.

i-570e165242a518d1b5717e83c3b896e1-Beipaiosaurusfossil.jpg

The simple feathers were discovered by Xu Xing, the famous Chinese palaeontologist who discovered such species as Microraptor and Dilong, among many others. The filaments are longer and broader than those possessed by other dinosaurs and  Xu calls them "elongated, broad, filamentous feathers" or EBFFs.

Each is about 10-15cm long and 2mm wide - not exactly thick, but still 10-20 times broader than the simple feathers of Sinosauropteryx. They are also unusually stiff, for despite the rigours of death and fossilisation, very few of them are curved or bent.

In other species of extinct dinosaur, simple feathers probably helped to insulate their bodies. But Beipaiosaurus's feathers were too patchily distributed to have provided much in the way of insulation and they certainly weren't complex enough for flight.

Instead, Xu thinks that the animal used them for display - their length and stiffness are well-suited for such a purpose, and they're only found on parts of the body that bear display feathers in modern birds. They provide strong evidence that feathers were used for display long before they were co-opted for flight. 

Beipaiosaurus's feathers provides yet more evidence that these structures, so characteristic of modern birds, actually evolved and diversified well before this group flew on the scene. For the moment, it's unclear how widespread these simple feathers were, whether they existed in other dinosaur species or even if they were found on other therizinosaurs - the bizarre group of dinosaurs that Beipaiosaurus belongs to. Is this species the exception, or just one of a wider group of (proto-)feathered friends?

Xu notes, perhaps controversially, that some species do bear long filaments that are remarkably similar to EBFFs. The primitive horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus had a row of long, hollow bristles at the base of its tail, which it probably used for display.  And some pterosaurs (flying reptiles that aren't dinosaurs) are covered in similar "hairs" on their neck, body and tail.

With similar filaments turning up in such disparate groups, it's possible that the sorts of filaments  that eventually became feathers were not just restricted to small, predatory dinosaurs. They may have turned up very early on in the evolution of the archosaurs - a diverse group of reptiles that includes dinosaurs, pterosaurs, crocodiles and the crurotarsans.

Image: Beipaiosaurus by Pavel Riha; fossil images from PNAS

Reference: X. Xu, X. Zheng, H. You (2009). A new feather type in a nonavian theropod and the early evolution of feathers Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810055106

More on feathered dinosaurs:

Subscribe to the feed

i-60c17a3e6bd99102bd1fce1281b55c89-Bookbanner.jpg

More like this

What happens when you find a feathered dinosaur that really isn't meant to have feathers? That's the question set by a spectacular new fossil that adds a confusing dimension to the origin of feathers. The concept of dinosaurs with feathers is no longer surprising. Birds certainly have them and…
Dinosaur books have become more colourful affairs of late, with the dull greens, browns and greys of yesteryear replaced by vivid hues, stripes and patterns. This has largely been a question of artistic licence. While fossils may constrain an artist's hand in terms of size and shape, they haven't…
By now most people know that feathers are no longer unique to birds. Thanks mostly to a series of wonderful fossils from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning Province, China, we now know that feathers first appeared in non-avian theropods, and were - later on - inherited by early…
Many of us believe dinosaurs to be extinct but in truth, they surround us every day. All the world's birds, from the pigeons of our cities to the gulls of our seasides, are descended from dinosaurs, and modern science now classifies the birds with their long-dead kin. The gulf between dinosaurs and…

That a really beautiful specimen. I'm more interested in the skull morphology, honestly. It's no surprise that therizinosaurs had feathers. They are consistently placed within Maniraptora. The only real debate is whether or not they are a sister group to oviraptorosaurs or not. Zanno's SVP presentation last year suggests that they do NOT, but instead form the most basal branch of the Maniraptora.

Awesome find, though. Now I need to get my grubby hands on a copy of the paper. Is there, perchance, a link?

Wait a minute, I thought crocodiles were crurotarsans!

It would be helpful to know when these things lived, and what happened before and after.

By Nathan Myers (not verified) on 13 Jan 2009 #permalink

Well how was I supposed to know? It's not like I actually ever wrote an entire article on the crurotars... oh bollocks. ;-)