From the Archives: How Do You ID A Dead Osama Anway?

If you didn't already know because, by chance, you missed my tweets, posts, and facebook updates, there is a science blogging contest going on RIGHT NOW. The 3 Quarks Daily Science Blogging Prize is currently narrowing down the top 20 posts from 87 nominees. To get through the gauntlet, a post has to get enough votes. Rather than remind you again to vote for Observations of a Nerd, I figured I'd show you why you should. Over the next 24 hours, I'll be reposting the three posts in the competition in case you missed them the first time. If you like them, and haven't already, cast your vote!

Osama Bin Laden is dead. At least, that's what we've been told, and I tend to believe such things.

But how do they know it's him? Well, they have the visual evidence and the body, for one. But to be certain it's not a look-a-like, the government has taken steps above and beyond to make sure they've got who they think they have: DNA analysis.

Now, I'm not entirely sure what DNA analysis has been done, but I can say this for certain - whatever method they used could be completed in a matter of hours given a lab ready to go and focused solely on this. Using commonplace PCR methods - which, for the record, is what I use in my lab every day - Bin Laden could easily be ID'd faster than you'd think. Heck, I can get DNA from a fish and turn it into sequences or genotypes in 24 hours, so I think the US government can work faster than me when time is of the essence. Allow let me explain how they could do it so quickly.

Step 1. Extract DNA
If they've got his body, then they've got enough DNA to run a billion or two genetic tests. It takes extremely little DNA to run genetic tests - on the order of single cells. So having even a 1 mm square piece of flesh would provide more DNA than they would even have use for. Extraction takes very little time. All you need to do it place the cells/tissue in some kind of solution that will break up the cell's membranes, thus liberating the DNA from the nucleus without damaging the DNA too much. There are hundreds of extraction kits and protocols. I don't know what the gov't extraction policy is, but the Arkansas State Crime Lab just uses sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid to extract DNA from their samples (which, btw, is how I get DNA from my fish samples, too). For example, this is their protocol for buccal punches (a.k.a. cheek tissue):

  1. Place 52 μl of 0.01 M NAOH in each well with 2.0 mm of tissue.
  2. Incubate samples at 65°C for 10 minutes.
  3. Add 10 μl of 0.1 M Tris HCl (pH 7.3).
  4. Mix.
  5. Let stand for 5 minutes.
  6. Samples are now ready for amplification
TOTAL TIME: 15 min

Step 2: Amplify Identifying DNA Sequences
Once you have DNA, you're ready to ID your suspect. While there have been a few methods used in the past, the onset of Polymerase Chain Reaction, or PCR technology, has made looking at parts of a genome pretty darn quick and easy.

The namesake of PCR, polymerase, is a very special enzyme that cells use to duplicate DNA. Polymerases are found in all creatures because we all must, at some point, have cells divide to grow and reproduce. When our cells divide, we have to make two copies of our genome - one for each new cell. To do this, our cells unwind the DNA, spread apart the two matching strands, then use each as templates to make two new strands. Polymerases are the enzymes that actually do that - they attach to single strands of DNA and grab matching nucleotides to create the other half of the strand.

PCR was invented in the 1980s and takes advantage of how our DNA reacts to temperature. At lower temperatures, like in our bodies, DNA sticks to it's complementary half and forms a tight helix. But as you turn up the heat, our DNA denatures - that is, it unwinds and each half of the helix separates. We can't use our own cell's polymerases for PCR because they can't stand that kind of heat. Instead, we've borrowed an enzyme from a particularly heat-tolerant bacteria to do the job for us.

PCR uses multiple cycles of heating and cooling to create thousands to millions of copies of a single piece of DNA. But how do we copy just what we want? Well, it turns out that polymerases need a little help getting started. They require a short sequence of RNA to tell them where to attach, called a primer. Because we can design this primer to match any unique sequence in the genome, we can target where the polymerase will attach, and voila. You've just picked your little chunk of genome to amplify over and over and over again. The total process doesn't take all that long - you heat it up for a bit, run it through a set of temperature cycles, and then you're good to go. The Arkansas protocol, for example, takes just about two and a half hours.

In the case of DNA fingerprinting, a set of very special genome regions called Short Tandem Repeats (or STRs) are used. These are non-coding sections that vary a lot between people. To be certain of ID, 13 separate regions, called loci, are compared between people. The chance that two people who are not twins would be the exact same across all 13 different loci is approximately 1 in 575 trillion.

The best part of PCR is that you can attach things to those primers to make the new DNA really easy to find. For example, the AmpFâSTR® Identifiler ⢠PCR Amplification Kit used by Arkansas has the primers for 15 different STR loci all tagged with fluorescent dyes. That means once you're done with the PCR, you're just a hop skip and a jump away from a full genetic ID.

TOTAL TIME: 3 hours, tops.

Step 3: Genotyping
Once you have your DNA amplified, you need to find out what it looks like. In the case of STRs, you're looking for how many repeats are in each DNA chunk. In other words, you're looking to see how long they are. Because they're each flagged with a fluorescent dye, the sequence in and of itself doesn't matter, just the size. Some people just run this out on a gel, which is what we see in our classic TV fingerprinting:

But nowadays, more and more labs are shifting to genotyping analysis with the help of automated machines. Determining the size of fluorescent labeled DNA sequences is the job of specialized machines like the ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer. It can take a sample of DNA and tell you how much DNA you have at what sizes in what colors. The output looks something like this:

The pattern of peaks are the person's "DNA Fingerprint". All you gotta do then is line them up with the peaks of your target person, and it's either a match or it's not.

TOTAL TIME: 1 hour, maybe less.

So how long did it take to get Bin Laden's fingerprint? Well, with the three steps here, just under 5 hours. And for all I know, the FBI has a faster way of doing it - I wouldn't exactly be shocked. That, and some are reporting he actually died last week sometime, and they've been waiting for the DNA confirmation - which also, frankly, wouldn't shock me.

Of course, to ID Bin Laden in this way, they would have to have some Bin Laden DNA lying around to compare it to. I don't know if they had some from some inside source, or not. What they do have is brain tissue from Bin Laden's sister, who died in the US. They can compare his genetic signature to hers and determine if they are related - which is as close as you can get to guaranteeing it's Bin Laden without a sample of his actual DNA from prior to his death.


More like this

I'm not a huge conspiracy nut that wears a tin foil hat nor do I worry that the gov. is watching my every move BUT I do believe the gov. lies to the American people. They have in the past, they will in the future, and there's not much we can do about it. I know that they also create and use events to keep people believing what they want them too.

I think the Bin Laden story is fake. I say this for a couple reasons. The presidents approval rating was hitting all time lows. He was getting a lot of criticism from his birth cert. He needed something that would help to get the American people to forget about what was going on.

More than just that, why would they kill someone that was so "important" to the American people and dump him in the ocean the very next day.

They did all the necessary testing and confirmations within about a 24 hour time frame, shipped or flew him out to the carrier and then dumped him into the ocean. All within the 24 +/- hour window

Bin Laden had been sick for years. For years we received reports, images, and even video of Bin Laden on dialysis because of his kidney disease. They then tell us he had kidney stones after he was "killed". So they had time to check that too?

The images released of Bin Laden watching tv show features that are different compared to other confirmed more recent photos of him. When comparing what can be seen of the eyes and ears they do not match.

Bin Laden started out working for the CIA. He received CIA funding, equipment, and training. There were reports that CIA officials had direct contact with him just after 9/11. One report talked about a CIA meeting while Bin Laden was in the hospital for his kidney problems.

It's all a little to convenient. Of course I'm being general with the information. If you question it do a little research and see what you think. I'm open to corrections.

Oh and to provide an answer to a question I get a lot when talking about this, "So if Bin Laden has been dead for much longer who did 9/11?" Look at WTC 7 (World Trade Center 7) which fell about 7 hours after the other towers. Watch the video of Larry Silverstein tell them to "pull it" and watch the building collapse. Pull it is a demolition term. If they pulled it then how did they get the explosives in place to do it???? The city was in chaos. Streets were blocked, people were dead, it was a total mess yet they had time to "pull it". The explosives would of needed to already be in place. Where were the sprinkler systems used to putout the fires? No sprinklers went off to extinguish the flames in WTC7.

Anyways there is my rant for the day....

The building broke into 3 section and collapsed in on top of itself. Before it collapsed there were blowouts on the outer wall like explosions.

And to further the question about 9/11, look at the pentagon. Compare the pentagon damage with the towers. When the planes hit the towers you see a distinct outline of the plane. You see the wings, vertical tail rotor and big hole for the main body. Can anyone show me that on any pictures or movies at the pentagon? All you have is a hole blown through several rings and that's it.

"truth" @ 1:

I'm not a huge conspiracy nut

followed by:

I think the Bin Laden story is fake.


The images released of Bin Laden watching tv show features that are different compared to other confirmed more recent photos of him.


The explosives would of needed to already be in place.


If you manage to find your way back, do be sure to let us know about the Kennedy assassination, the Bilderburgs, the Trilateral Commission, and Roswell.

No I don't consider myself to be a conspiracy nut but there are too many questions about the information provided on Bin Laden to fully believe the story that was given. Do I think he is dead sure I do but I don't fully believe the story on how we "killed" him.

There are things I question and wonder why they are the way they are. There are facts and information that contradicts some of the stories that are feed to the American people.

I wanted to further support the questions by providing some information related to the overall topic. Did you watch the video? Have you watched any of the videos on WTC 7? What about the head of the EPA standing in front of everyone telling them that the air is safe to breath. There are no toxins in the air. All the dust is really safe for you.

"On September 18, 2001, EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman told the public, via a press release, "We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of air-quality and drinking-water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances" and that "Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York ⦠that their air is safe to breathe and the water is safe to drink."[12]"…

A 2008 report by New York City's Department of Health indicated that up to 70,000 people might have long term health problems due to the dust.

Not even a little fishy to you?? Really?

The only reason I choose to make the first post was because of her opening statement "Osama Bin Laden is dead. At least, that's what we've been told, and I tend to believe such things." It seemed to me that she might question some things as well. Maybe not entirely but she will "tend to believe such things" and I wanted to point out some things that I tend no too.