It's me again

I only mention this because it infuriates the wingnuts and religious ravers, but if you go to my university's main web page you might see an article about me (I say "might" because only 4 are shown at a time, and which 4 is random). It's awfully hard to get across to the critics, but the university supports me despite not necessarily endorsing my every opinion, and despite individuals in the administration feeling a little uncomfortable with some of my views, because there is this principle of academic freedom—it's part of the job of an academic to make people uncomfortable. If you want vacuous pablum, that's what the right-wing think tanks are for.

I don't visit the main page much, so I wouldn't have noticed this except that Larry Moran brought it to my attention. I should have made sure the photo accompanying the article had been properly credited, with something like "Photo courtesy of Larry the Camera Guy" across the bottom.

More like this

The news today from Inside Higher Ed is that the University of Colorado Board of Regents voted to fire Ward Churchill. You may recall that in May 2006, a faculty panel at the university found that the tenured ethnic studies professor had committed repeated, intentional academic misconduct in his…
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina, Wilmington. He is also a contributor to the crazy right-wing website Town Hall, which does not bode well for anything he writes. Let's have a look at his latest offering: Recently, I received a rare student complaint…
Attention conservation notice: A couple thousand words of reply to questions about why I think NCSE does what it does, delivered in my capacity as a random blogger not as an NCSE staffer. People who don't care about accommodationism or about how I read the NCSE website should probably just go…
Thanks again to those who blogged, commented or emailed regarding our PLoS Biology manuscript. Nick already has his own response here, highlighting posts such as Larry's, Blake's, Drug Monkey's, Thomas', and Carlo's. Several criticisms ran along the same lines: that, as Nick notes, "that…

Unfortunately the author of the article demoted you to Assistant Professor. I hope that doesn't mean you have to go through another tenure review. ;)

By Steve LaBonne (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

His personal Web blog, Pharyngula (pronounced far-ING-ula...)

Nice article -- and I learned something too.

Fortunately, I think these articles have roughly no official standing over at payroll.

You never know, some overzealous new hire could have seen that and be processing your pay cut as we write...

By afarensis (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

PZ, apparently you went to "a natural history museum". Nope, you went to THE Natural History Museum. Can't these people get anything right!

I clicked "refresh" quite a few times on the UMM main page before the Dawkins/Myer article popped up. I'm not sure you're getting your 25% time share. I blame creationists!

Be very worried if they take away your red swingline stapler.

By squidward (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

In regards to the statement that your university might not agree with 'everything' you say; I am proud to know that the position of a prof is still held by those (fleetingly few, it seems at time) who are able and willing to speak both their mind and their knowledge. So many people are sated by living in the middle, on the fence, and too few are willing to say what everyone is thinking. Kudos.

Yeah, the 4 articles at random thing seems a bit broken for me. For me the upper left and lower right articles were always the same in my ~50 refresh sample. The other two articles did tend to vary from one loading to the next. I smell a conspiracy! Or something...

...I may have forgotten to put on deodorant this morning.

By Grimmstail (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

The guy in the suit and tie, Collin Peterson, never goes away. He's there every time I refresh. He must be important.

Nice article. Makes all the right points.

By afterthought (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

"but the university supports me despite not necessarily endorsing my every opinion, and despite individuals in the administration feeling a little uncomfortable with some of my views, because there is this principle of academic freedom--"

And because you have tenure. I wonder how long they would abide you if you did not?

"Tenure. A gift from God or a life sentence?"

Sugarbear writes, "And because you have tenure. I wonder how long they would abide you if you did not?"

At the universities I've seen, graduate students are just as free as tenured professors to express views, from the outrageous to the mundane. Lecturers, too. Their fear is just that the demand for the courses they teach will lessen. As long as those courses fill a niche, universities are happy to have their cheap labor. Assistant professors are the one beknighted group. They are too busy to talk about anything that doesn't lead to their tenure review.

I particularly like the screen shot I just got.

"University of Minnesota Morris"

"Recognized nationally for all the right reasons."

And immediately underneath, centered, "PZ Myers exchanges theories with Richard Dawkins"!

-Rusty

By minusRusty (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

PZ says,

but the university supports me despite not necessarily endorsing my every opinion, and despite individuals in the administration feeling a little uncomfortable with some of my views, because there is this principle of academic freedom--

Sugarbear replies,

And because you have tenure. I wonder how long they would abide you if you did not?

Tenure means that you can't be fired for your beliefs or your viewpoints. It's how we protect academic freedom. Tenure and academic freedom are just two versions of the same thing.

Tenure does not protect you if you are incompetent.

From the article:

Matt Larson '01, for example, won first prize for "best undergraduate research presentation" at the 2001 National Zebrafish Conference.

I didn't realize there was such a thing as the National Zebrafish Conference. Dare I ask how many confused furries showed up?

With respect PZ, I think you failed to correct the Morris article on one (other) point...

He deftly separates his personal beliefs from his classroom lecture topics: "I tell my students that they must talk about facts and evidence."

... I thought that was your belief. :-)

(I kid 'cause I envy.)

Actually, tenure might very well protect you if you're incompetent -- as long as your chair, dean, and/or academic vp are such lazy butts that they prefer to sit around whining about how tenure protects incompetents (instead of doing their job of documenting incompetence). One of my colleagues actually bought into the notion that job security or tenure was a shield for the bad profs -- at least until our dean made her a believer by building a solid case against an instructor and showing him the door. And there was much rejoicing (because we were always having to clean up the incompetent's messes).

Unfortunately, I think you'll find that lots of people swallow it hook, line, and sinker when some administrator shrugs his or her shoulders in abject defeat and says, "What can I do? The teacher is tenured!" Well, you could do your job... (No one said it was supposed to be easy to dismiss a teacher.)