Physicists Are Cheap

That's the inevitable conclusion to be drawn by anyone looking at the DonorsChoose Leaderboard at the moment. So far, we've had ten donations to my challenge, raising a total of $395 for deserving school teachers and students, which is good, and I thank those who have contributed.

But, man, we're getting our clocks cleaned in both absolute and per-capita terms. I mean, it's one thing for PZ Myers and his billions of tentacled minions to be beating us in absolute dollars, but even in average-donation terms, we're getting housed. Math nerds have ponied up an average of $110/donation, the squid freaks are next with $98/donation, and even philosophers of science are more generous than physicists, averaging $59.50 to our $39.50.

C'mon, people, cough up some cash! Surely somebody has some spare funds sitting in a research grant that needs to be spent out before the end of the fiscal year?

i-bc34b702798f01b10409f7481ac9dc21-link_donorschoose_small.gif

More like this

Our month-long drive with DonorsChoose to raise funds for public school classroom projects has been under way for almost two weeks now. At the moment, the ScienceBlogs leaderboard show a total of $15,890 from 121 generous donors, benefiting 6,971 public school students. That's pretty good work so…
We're nearly to the halfway mark (in terms of time) on Blogger Challenge 2008 and the mommy bloggers are still leaving us in their dust. We've told you about the school kids you could help by donating to our challenges, we've offered small incentives (and big incentives). Today, the news comes…
Today is the one week mark in our month-long drive with DonorsChoose to raise funds for public school classroom projects, and it is no surprise that ScienceBlogs readers have been generous in their support. As I write this post, the ScienceBlogs leaderboard indicates: Thirteen challenges mounted…
At the time of this writing, the Uncertain Principles blog challenge stands in first place on the ScienceBlogs Leaderboard, with just under $2,000 in donations so far. That's almost a third of the challenge goal of $6000 in just three days, which is fantastic. Thank you for your generosity. Of…

I bristled a bit at your per capita comparison. I donated to your challenge, but as an astronomy grad student, I'm sorry if my donation helped the numbers to fall below the per capita donations of the biologists.

I think a better tactic is to shame those phyisicists into donating. I, a lowely, poor, and under-paid grad student was able to find a few nickels to donate to under-paid and under-appreciated teachers. So, any of you physicists or astronomers out there making real money should be able to do the same or better! Get out there you slackers.

That was perhaps not the most diplomatic phrasing I could've used, but I figured it was worth trying the per capita angle, just to have a different way to write a "please donate money" post (and it required less research than Janet's dollars per visitor stats...).

Insulting people in passing did work to generate a couple more large donations, though-- we're now up to $846.02, and a respectable $70.50/donation average. Thanks to all who have contributed.

Perhaps some of PZ's tenticled minions, will be tempted to throw a few bucks your way just to lower your per capita numbers.

:)

By No One of Cons… (not verified) on 21 Jun 2006 #permalink

Perhaps some of PZ's tenticled minions, will be tempted to throw a few bucks your way just to lower your per capita numbers.

That'd be cool with me.
I'm not afraid to change standards back to absolute numbers (I notice that the recent contributions have put us in third place in terms of absolute dollars raised...) if we start getting a large influx of calamari cash...

The key to generating the normalized stats is not so much research (beyond the leaderboard and Google Analytics) as a spreadsheet. Also, it doesn't hurt to have a writing project or two you're putting off.

Also, grad students who give in drives like these -- even teeny amounts of money -- get major karmic credit.