Life Cycle of Science PR

One of the fun things about EurekAlert is that it allows you to trace the full life cycle of the publicization of science in a way that used to be impossible for a regular person. For example, take the recent "Ring of Dark Matter" story.

First, there's a rumor of a result. This first stage lasts about a week, and if all goes well, it manages to generate a little buzz, and maybe even some divination.

The rumor, warmed by the buzz, will then hatch, giving rise to a press release. Dependning on the species, you may get two, and for highly collaborative research, you can generate even more.

In collaborative subjects, the different types of press release are easy to tell apart because of their distinctive markings. A government release will generally include a picture, and its distinctive call (or "headline") will include only the name of the large publicly-funded instrument used to make the measurement. The academic press release is generally smaller and more drab in coloration, but has a louder call, trumpeting the name of the institution behind the release for all to hear.

If all goes well, the press release stage of the cycle lasts 3-4 days, during which time the release finds a reporter. Upon encountering a reporter, the release will crawl into his or her brain (generally via the optic nerve), and enter the pupal stage. In this state, it will incubate for a few hours, or as long as a couple of days, depending on deadlines. At the end of the incubation period, the transformed release will hatch and crawl back out of the reporter (generally via the fingers, but sometimes via the mouth, in the form of a four-paragraph squib in the New York Times.

These four-paragraph squibs are almost immediately caught and consumed by bloggers and citizens. Their role in the reproduction of the results is not clear, but it's widely believed in the funding community that the digestion of squibs releases nutrients that foster the growth of rumors through some sort of spontaneous generation process, like maggots forming out of rotting meat.

More like this

There is a lot of science stuff in newspapers that is just (barely) warmed over press releases from companies or universities. They get pushed out into the world via aggregating services like Eurekalert. Lots of science bloggers and journalists use this stuff for ideas and sources, but even when…
You may notice, a couple of posts down, a post with the title "Links for 2007-10-03," with a bunch of, well, links in it. This was auto-generated by del.icio.us, and is the main reason why I started using that service this week-- the idea is to give me a way to collect together the sort of almost-…
Christine Huffard sent me a note alerting me to the publication of her latest paper, and she thought I might be interested because I "seem to like cephalopods". Hah. Well. I've noticed that Dr Huffard seems to have some small affection for the tentacled beasties herself. The paper follows on an…
On the heels of David Warlick's session on using online tools in the science classroom, this initiative is really exciting: Teachers, Students, Web Gurus, and Foundations Launch Campaign to Transform Education, Call for Free, Adaptable Learning Materials Online Cape Town, January 22nd, 2008--A…

Regardless of the bold type, the post is fantastic.

Well done, Chad. I think this qualifies for inclusion in the "Science Basics" list.