Softcoral Porn

Would sexier oceans get a bigger budget?
In 2006, the U.S. alone spent an estimated $13.3 billion on the sex and porn industry. Worldwide, it was estimated sex industry sales were $97 billion.

Meanwhile, as of 1999, the entire world was spending only about $6 billion on nature reserves globally. The Sea Around Us Project will soon release a study showing the global cost of marine protected areas (MPAs) to be an estimated $1 billion.

i-07116a406ed22a033016fd8da12fd167-softcoral.001.tiff

What's a marine protected area got to do? Do we need to make the oceans sexier to get money for them? Maybe some softcoral porn will do the trick.

Before: i-a19358d6be286e504a153163c32bc27a-SoftCoral.jpg

After:
i-65def0eb3229d220e0b80f575f198399-CoralPA.jpg

I hate to call into question the national or global fiscal priorities, but the global ecosystem provides us with an estimated $33 trillion worth of value annually and we're throwing $6 billion at it in return (and $1 billion to MPAs)?

Tags

More like this

Karen Starko writes: When the "financial crisis" started and the news media started throwing around numbers in the trillions and projected fixes in the billions, I realized I just didn't get it. So I got a little yellow post-it, labeled it "understanding trillions," and started a list of examples.…
We now have an estimate of the cost of the Iraq war. Remember when our administration was blithely proposing that it would require a few billion dollars? The authors present a damning "Nightline" transcript in which one official, Andrew Natsios, blandly told Ted Koppel that Iraq could be completely…
Ahoy mates, and welcome aboard the 36th edition of the Carnival of the Blue! The Oceans as a whole: As many of you might know, CITES had its once-every-three-years meeting during which it decides which organisms are to be regulated and how. As Rick MacPherson explains, the overall message was…
On Monday night I went to the cinema and watched the new environmental movie The End of the Line, directed by Rupert Murray. Featuring habitats, scientists and case studies worldwide, it shows how our rampant and poorly controlled (or uncontrolled) exploitation of the global oceans is depleting (…

it looks like a sexy, sexy burn victim

Unclosed bold is the new sexy.

By Ron Jeremy (not verified) on 26 Nov 2007 #permalink

Bold is sexy. Timid is not.

I'll never think of coral....the same way again...

I am in complete agreement. How oh how do we make MPAs more seductive?? Even jellyfish are sexier than MPAs. Perhaps we need a Pamela equivalent for the marine conservation movement. Jennifer- it's a toss up between you and my screen saver..

I propose an ocean tax on sex and porn. We could turn our vices into virtues. That could even be a campaign slogan. Now we just need a candidate willing to come out in support of environmentally conscious masturbation.

I am surprised that no commenter mentioned the hard coral yet...

I made an off the wall comment earlier, but I do recognize how misplaced our priorities are. Your financial comparisons are a sad commentary on the state of the world. Unfortunately, I don't see that changing anytime in the immediate future.

And note: just because we are having fun in the comments does not mean we did not understand the real message of your post.

I think the comparison between expenditures on sex vs. marine protection is quite a stretch, myself. But Pamela Lee Coral is a nice reminder of our whack priorities...