Double Eclipses on Jupiter: The Picture I Really Want!

"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." -Galileo Galilei

Ever since the time of Galileo, Jupiter has been an amazing sight for skywatchers. With its four large moons, even the smallest of amateur telescopes provide amazing sights.

In fact, if you watch Jupiter's four large Moons over the span of a few hours, you're likely to discover the same exact thing that Galileo did.

You can see that Jupiter's moons orbit around Jupiter! Looking through a larger telescope, like the video above was shot using, you can actually see the shadows of Jupiter's moons falling on the planet itself.

And we've actually captured some remarkable shots of Jupiter's Galilean satellites.

Check out this shot, by Kevin Quinn, of two of Jupiter's Moons, Ganymede and Europa, both casting their shadow on the planet at the same time: a double eclipse.

Of course, if you had the Hubble space telescope, you can pretty much do whatever you want. Including looking at Jupiter at just the right time...

...to see a triple eclipse! That's three of Jupiter's moons' shadows falling on the planet at the same time! You have to really look at juuuuust the right time to make this happen, because the orbits don't often line up like that.

But I want more. What do I want? Hubble, my birthday is many months off, but let me tell you what I really want. I want a photo of Jupiter's moons lined up so perfectly that we don't just get a double eclipse, but that one of Jupiter's moons has its shadow fall on an inner moon of Jupiter!

Does this happen? Of course it does; Jupiter's moons orbit at an incline to Jupiter, and it's only a matter of time before they line up correctly! In fact, I may have scavenged an image where it happened: take a look!

But you know what I really want: I want Hubble to capture it! Why?

Because with Hubble's resolution, we could actually see one moon's shadow on another moon!

And this is something that really happens, and we actually have the technology to image it today! Here's hoping!

More like this

"Nothing in the universe can travel at the speed of light, they say, forgetful of the shadow's speed." -Howard Nemerov I know many of you are still mad at the night sky because of the full Moon preventing you from seeing the recent, close-by supernova in the Pinwheel Galaxy, at least until the end…
The first and oldest of the experiments in the Top Eleven is actually a two-fer: Galileo Galilei is nominated both for the discovery of the moons of Jupiter, and for his experiments on the motion of falling objects. Who: Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), the great Italian physicist, astronomer, and…
Coronographic imaging with the Advanced Camera for Surveys, on the Hubble Space Telescope, has revealed a jupiter mass planetary companion, with confirmed common proper motion with its parent star, Fomalhaut. This would be the first robust bona fide direct imaging detection of an extrasolar planet…
The final step of the scientific process is to share your results with others, and that's the step where things are most prone to breaking down. Countless great discoveries have been delayed or temporarily lost because the people who made them were more concerned with protecting "their" secrets…

I assume Hubble is still spoken for pretty much 100% of viable operation hours, but surely whatever team manages Hubble could see the value of this. Is it crazy to think this idea would be heeded if spoken into the right ear?

For my birthday, I want Hubble to take a picture of me taking a picture of it. Totally plausible.

What sort of color filter was used on Rainbow Brite Jupiter there?

Can you estimate how often this wonderful alignment happens?
When is the next right time for capturing this event?

Is one of Jove Pater's moons orbit retrograde?
Another question, the moons appear so large in comparison with the planet. Jupiter is humungous. The moons aren't much more than our moon, if that. The distance is humungous. Why do they appear so large? I have an 8 inch dobsonian and when I've looked at Jupiter I've had to convince myself that the nearby lights are not stars because they are just too big and far away from such an (apparent) small planet to be moons. It's how I imagine the moon looks beside the Earth (I think the Moon is pretty large compared to the Earthf) from Jupiter.

@Brian: No, the moons' size looks reasonable to me. Jupiter's radius is about 7*10^4 km, and the Galilean satellites have radii in the 1500-2700 km range. The blue satellite in the triple eclipse figure looks to have about 1/30 the radius of Jupiter, which is very nearly the actual value for Callisto (r = 2400 km) and consistent (to the precision which I eyeballed it) with Ganymede.

For comparison, the Moon's radius is more than 1/4 that of the Earth's. Yes, the Moon is large beside the Earth. Relative distances also matter here, if you're taking a photo from Earth orbit, while the difference in distances to Jupiter and its satellites from Earth is small compared with the total.

By Eric Lund (not verified) on 11 Mar 2011 #permalink

1) As to Galileo's quote - he obviously never had to deal with quantum mechanics. :)

@SeanHogge - I think a dude on Earth would be far to small to resolve using Hubble. Would you be willing to pose on Ganymede?

" altın çilek " above is a spambot. Please nukeuser.

By Hank Roberts (not verified) on 12 Mar 2011 #permalink

@DataJack Are you sure about Hubble's resolution? When pointed at the moon, it's several meters per pixel - too large to resolve the mirrors or Apollo craft. However, being so close to earth, surely it would approach 1 meter per pixel.

Regardless, I'd be happy to pose on Ganymede. When do I lift off? Can we swing by Europa for a space slushie?

So, how much is an hour of Hubble time, and does NASA sell gift cards?

nice...very much enjoyed the video on finding the next site....

By Wayne Williamson (not verified) on 14 Mar 2011 #permalink