Quote of the day

From Lawrence Krauss, in a discussion with Natalie Jeremijenko that is featured in the latest issue of Seed:

I think that's what makes science special. As a scientist and someone who tries, for better or worse, to extol the virtues of science in a society that doesn't appreciate many of those virtues, I think that ultimately the good stuff wins out even if it takes a while to do it. Because the final arbiter of success isn't people. In science, it's experiments. It's the ability to make it work. If it works, then people buy into it, whether they like it or not. And I really think that's profoundly important. That, and the oft-misunderstood fact that science doesn't prove things to be true. Science only proves things to be false. That's all it does. But that alone is something that doesn't happen in almost any other area of human activity. The fact that you can say, "That's garbage, don't talk about it any more." The earth isn't flat. We don't need to have critical thinking classes to debate or discuss it. You just go around it, end of story. And the ability to throw out ideas that aren't productive is, to me, what makes science unique and what allows for progress. You don't have to keep wasting your time on the wrong things, because the wrong things are obvious. The right things may not be obvious, but the wrong things should be. And if I could just convince people of that, I think it would go a long way to getting people to have a perspective of science that is useful.

Categories

More like this

Tonight's edition of The O'Reilly Factor featured a discussion of the brand new creation museum outside Cincinnati. Guest host John Kasich was sitting in for Bill O'Reilly. Representing darkness and ignorance was creationist impresario Ken Ham, president of Answers in Genesis. On the side of…
A friend of mine recently asked me a simple question that I couldn't answer: i want to know if there is a physiological explanation for why we have an easier time remembering things that we perceive to be true. bad example: suppose that you believed that the earth was flat. then i took you out…
So, why math? The short version of the answer is remarkably simple: math provides a tool where you can, without ambiguity, prove that something is true or false. I'll get back to that - but first, I'm going to make a quick diversion, to help you understand my basic viewpoint on things. This…
I gave Lawrence Krauss some shit regarding his double standard towards the tolerance of willful ignorance. He's cool with calling intelligent design proponents ignorant, but won't go all the way and say all religion is anti-knowledge. Judging by the letters in the NYTimes, there are some people who…

As a scientist and someone who tries, for better or worse, to extol the virtues of science in a society that doesn't appreciate many of those virtues, I think that ultimately the good stuff wins out even if it takes a while to do it.

I agree. The good stuff does ultimately win, and usually takes time. I have read of so many dedicated researchers who got no more satisfaction than to write down their results hoping later in time, sometimes after their lifetimes, someone would find it and be able to implement it. And fortunately for us many times that is just what happened!
Dave Briggs :~)