US Navy is claiming successful shootdown of USA 193
Hey, totality of the Lunar eclipse!
Pretty...
CNN just reported that the USS Erie - and Aegis class cruiser - successfully intercepted and destroyed the USA 193 intelligence satellite with a modified SM-3 missile.
Hm. Show offs.
USA 193 was launched about 15 months ago, got to orbit but then lost attitude control and started a rapid decay.
Presumably a) thruster control was lost, and b) satellite went into gravity gradient mode.
It is allegedly a synthetic aperture radar sat, although there are rumblings that it is curiously underweight, so maybe a proof of concept rather than production sat, but if it has big dishes on booms and it went 90 degrees off attitude, it would indeed degrade rapidly in its orbit.
Official reason for shooting it down is controlled descent of chunky bits that might survive re-entry - including a full hydrazine tank - mustn't poison any more Peruvians. (see Y-Ranter)
Unofficially, the reason is to make sure no classified curious bits and bobs end up in central Asia where locals might pick them up and look at them
and a lot of people think it is being done to give the Navy some live target practise and send a message to random people about the US ability to intercept on some occasion lumps of metal moving fast on (sub)orbital trajectories.
Whatevah.
- Log in to post comments
Just wondering, does anyone believe the official reason?
there was this very sincere looking broadcaster on the local fox news station...
The real official reason: to let the BMD Agency signal its credibility to the Federal Government.
The real reason: to let the US Navy demonstrate its superiority to the US Air Force.
"The real reason: to let the US Navy demonstrate its superiority to the US Air Force."
As if that needed to be demonstrated. ;)
Who was first on the moon? You got it.
Well, the US Navy is still trying to make up for Project Vanguard and the Army beating them to space...
I think Alex has got it.
381 F22s? Who needs 'em? Now a new attack sub....
'a) thruster control was lost, and b) satellite went into gravity gradient mode.'
(c) someone is walking around thinking 'where the fuck did I leave that spanner? Last time was...oh.'
I think the plausible causal sequence is c) -> a) -> b)