AAS: more snippets

more assorted science results from AAS

Tags

More like this

we hates bloomin' N, we does

sctually a self-respecting white dwarf with an oxygen core ought not to have much any N, and it is hard to make in the process

makes me seriously doubt the WD tidal disruption scenario, that and some other things

been thinking about this object for much of 2009

It's not necessarily obvious to me that the lack of H emission requires no H. At high enough temperature it's all ionized. Needs some careful thought.
Maccarone's BH in a globular cluster, that Zepf et al. think is a stellar-mass BH accreting from a WD, is remarkably similar to Irwin's object. Hmm.

By Craig Heinke (not verified) on 06 Jan 2010 #permalink

As one of the co-conspirators of Maccarone's BH I'd have to disagree on it being "remarkably similar" to Jimmy's source. The OIII line in the NGC 4472 BH is a few thousand km/s wide as opposed to 70 km/s in Jimmy's source. There are many other classes of objects that come into the picture at 70 km/s. Also the 4472 source shows OIII and only OIII (so far). No N.

There is of course the small matter that the 4472 source showed short term variability in a L>NS_Edd object insinuating a BH, while the latter has so far not done so. Still a possibility that the NGC 1399 candidate is a superposition of multiple bright X-ray sources.

Hmm. Well, Arunav, I'll keep reading all the papers on 'em--you've got me hooked. These objects are fascinating, and clearly not well enough studied; I think TACs would find it difficult to deny more time to study them.

By Craig Heinke (not verified) on 08 Jan 2010 #permalink

Craig, erudite scholars such as yourself with discerning, refined tastes should clearly be on every applicable TAC ...