Phylogeny vs. Aerodynamics in birds

A very interesting new paper was published today in PLoS Biology:

Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects by Thomas Alerstam, Mikael Rosen, Johan Backman, Per G. P. Ericson and Olof Hellgren:

Analysing the variation in flight speed among bird species is important in understanding flight. We tested if the cruising speed of different migrating bird species in flapping flight scales with body mass and wing loading according to predictions from aerodynamic theory and to what extent phylogeny provides an additional explanation for variation in speed. Flight speeds were measured by tracking radar for bird species ranging in size from 0.01 kg (small passerines) to 10 kg (swans). Equivalent airspeeds of 138 species ranged between 8 and 23 m/s and did not scale as steeply in relation to mass and wing loading as predicted. This suggests that there are evolutionary restrictions to the range of flight speeds that birds obtain, which counteract too slow and too fast speeds among bird species with low and high wing loading, respectively. In addition to the effects of body size and wing morphology on flight speed, we also show that phylogeny accounted for an important part of the remaining speed variation between species. Differences in flight apparatus and behaviour among species of different evolutionary origin, and with different ecology and flight styles, are likely to influence cruising flight performance in important ways.

Update: Grrrlscientist explains the study in plain English.

More like this

tags: researchblogging.org, flight speed, birds, ornithology, aerodynamics, evolution Not Bad, But Not Perfect A peregrine falcon keeps a close eye as she circles her nest in St. Louis. A new survey of 138 species of birds finds that closely-related birds fly at roughly the same speeds and that…
Synthetic Adhesive Mimics Sticking Powers Of Gecko And Mussel: Geckos are remarkable in their ability to scurry up vertical surfaces and even move along upside down. Their feet stick but only temporarily, coming off of surfaces again and again like a sticky note. But put those feet underwater, and…
What a Christmas present - there are 32 new articles in PLoS ONE today and they are amazing! As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea…
There are 27 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one…

I'm having a hard time seeing the difference between "effects of body size and wing morphology" vs phylogeny. i see that for birds of similar structure (because they are taxonomically "phylogeny" related) relations are more straight forward and there are better extrapolations to speed. Still, that is because of similarity of body size and wing structure, no? Isn't relatedness just a marker for metabolic and mechanical similarities?
Plus I am surprised that power is not the primary factor taken into account - it certainly is in aerodynamic design.

I like these kinds of approaches.