Another interesting graph....

Click on image to check stats, play around...

More like this

A bunch of updates are in store. First the DonorsChoose update. Let's look at the whole SEED scienceblogs action first (thanks Janet for all the information): Total raised so far: 13,535.14Total donors so far: 170 Excluding Pharyngula (because Pharyngula is done), the top 5 in terms of ... Amt/…
So, next week will be the World's Fair's half year mark, so it's basically time to access how we're doing. First up, is to check our traffic stats, which are nicely graphed out as follows: Hmmm... Interesting... Note that if you consider that we technically started around the first week of June,…
The Huffington Post put up a good piece about vaccination. It's by Dr. Harvey Karp, and he does an especially nice job looking at some of the "scary numbers" used by the infectious disease promoters. He's also getting swamped with wackaloon comments, so if you don't mind giving HuffPo your…
So, every once in awhile I check my feedburner stats, to see what kind of stuff attracts people to my site. You know, where people link to me from, etc. Well, I usually have a few from random google searches like "science nerd" or "tiger" (something about my Tiger Wine post is apparently very…

I had followed Science Blogs for some time before I knew that SEED existed. I'm not sure how that happened.

By Roger Austin (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink

This is odd, right? ODD.

By DrugMonkey (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink

Odd? It was always like that. Seed IS scienceblogs, and the magazine is one of their several failed side-experiments. I wish their office recognized this, and allocated staff and funds accordingly. Everything at Seed should be set up to be in service of Scienceblogs: administrators, legal staff, editors, and most importantly a large, powerful, innovative technical staff.

So yes, this says that all stuff should be set up toward us. I think we can say this is NOT the case, but what exactly is the discrepancy? Do they pay individual writers for SEED? Individual editors? Does SEED have a tech support person at all?

If the answer to all these things is yes, it makes me rather sad. That's about 30% more site views in a month than I made here. It'd be like having a huge support staff for a blog slightly bigger than mine was.

Did you see the things people search for when they end up at either site? For ScienceBlogs they type in "Bora Zivkovich" but people visiting SEED were looking for "time magazine profile on stravinsky, by philip glass" or "monkey having sex with humans"

By ImNotTypingMyN… (not verified) on 12 Jul 2010 #permalink

The stats are bit depressing. After the last print edition in September 2009, you'd expect at least some transition from print to online readership, but, in reality, it plunged for most of the Fall and Winter and has only now passed the readership from last Summer. I'll note that, looking at a single year, it's difficult to say whether this is seasonal, but that seems unlikely since it doesn't affect

According to wikipedia, the original issue has a circulation of 105K in 2001. Could it really be that the online visits 9 years later are even lower than that value? (I'm now noticing that the magazine is every other month so I guess that 150K unique visits every two months.) Still pretty sad. As someone how hasn't followed the magazine and had trouble getting into most of the articles I found through links, I guess this isn't overly surprising.

Seed IS scienceblogs... Everything at Seed should be set up to be in service of Scienceblogs: administrators, legal staff, editors, and most importantly a large, powerful, innovative technical staff.

Like I said, this is very odd. I am intensely curious as to what Bly thinks his business IS.

By DrugMonkey (not verified) on 12 Jul 2010 #permalink

I suspect the April spike is for Eyjafjallajökull.

Eruptions was the go-to site for all the latest info.

I want to see the data for Pepsicopalypse.

By theshortearedowl (not verified) on 13 Jul 2010 #permalink

Compare the numbers between versus The trend is interesting.

You might want to try not discoverY. It's fairly close to, though science blogs is bigger and is the address for their magazine AND blogs. SB is also close to (magazine) and blogs) and ahead of (just magazine)

Of interest, discover seems to be steadily increasing their traffic since January 2010. Is this when they started to seriously invest and enlarge their blogger base?