No Longer Science Fiction: Ray Guns To Control People

i-9d274270d0515c75054855e97a24fd76-highspeed-wireless.jpgEarlier this year, some in Sebastopol, California were very concerned over potential health hazards of wireless internet and halted a local company from providing public wifi access. (For details, visit O'Reilly). While I'm less nervous over electrical sensitivity, I can't help but wonder what residents would think about reports of a new microwave ray gun able to beam sounds directly into people's heads. From this month's New Scientist:

The device - dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) - exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds.

The device is aimed for military or crowd-control applications, but may have other uses.

Crowd control applications? MEDUSA?

Or what about the Pentagon's ray gun? You can't see it, you can't hear it, but the harmless blast will stop you in your tracks.

An operator uses a joystick to zero in on a target. Visible only with an infrared camera, the gun, when fired emits a flash of white hot energy - an electromagnetic beam made up of very high frequency radio waves.

Okay, reports say harmless... but between shockwaves inside the skull and white hot energy, I'm moving to Sonoma County.

Tags

More like this

By way of AP and BoingBoing, one can find this post by Dale Daugherty on O'Reilly Radar about the newest attack of the tinfoil-hat-wifi-radiation brigade: Our town, Sebastopol, had passed a resolution in November to permit a local Internet provider to provide public wireless access. This week,…
Scientists are using T-Ray technology in a new way-to help uncover murals that have been hidden under layers of plaster or paint in old buildings. T-Rays (which are pulses of terahertz radiation that were previously used in space shuttle devices) have now been applied to this new technology by a…
In the first post in this primer series we discussed the nature of electromagnetic radiation. It is via EM radiation that the sun's energy reaches the earth and since it is the balance between the energy that reaches the earth and the energy that is radiated away from the earth that is at the…
All right ladies and gentlemen, today we're performing an experiment! More of a demonstration, really, but one that's very easy and will impress your friends. You will need: 1) One remote control. 2) One camera phone. The vast majority of remote controls operate via an infrared light-emitting…

BAD WOW!!
This can't be good..really scary.

By Sciencefan (not verified) on 11 Jul 2008 #permalink

yeah, I'm not too convinced about the "harmless" bit, especially if the victim is unable to get out of the beam. I do notice the linked article states "as long as it's been used properly, there's no harm to your body." [my emphasis]

It also sounds like the perfect implement of torture.

The tazer has moved from a weapon to incapacitate without killing a dangerous suspect, to being an instrument of compliance. I'm afraid that the more "Harmless" these devices become, the more likely they'll be used. I shudder to think about how often these might be used to modify the behavior of legal protests or annoying (not dangerous) suspects.

We need these ray guns in the hands of the average law-abiding citizen. Only when we remove their monopoly on a new defense technology will be free from fear of the government. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

By actionmax (not verified) on 11 Jul 2008 #permalink

Or maybe what we need is to start tackling "non-lethal" weapons as a broad legal issue, instead of leaving them (as it seems now) totally unregulated and free for misuse.

Police and government violence is most effectively controlled from the ballot box. For example, I hate the idea of police using these to repress legal demonstrations, but I'm not sure I'd want to be in a demonstration where people started shooting back with these things. That could just give the police a pretext to respond with lethal force.

I can see the sense in having them available for private citizens, but that might require some regulation just to do that, as the companies producing them could easily choose not to sell them to anyone other than police if they have enough incentive not to make them available to the public. (Though I guess you can buy tasers now...)

By bicycle Hussei… (not verified) on 12 Jul 2008 #permalink

Did I read it correctly? Are they actually designing a weapon that microwaves your brain?

Well, I'm sure there can be counter-measures. Lead-lined hats, perhaps?

By Christophe Thill (not verified) on 15 Jul 2008 #permalink