1. loom
  2. Two stories in tomorrow's New York Times

Two stories in tomorrow's New York Times

By loom on December 25, 2006.

All I want for Christmas is a lying frog and a bubble-sniffing mole.

For those who want to head for the original papers, check out:

1. "Why Animals Lie: How Dishonesty and Belief Can Coexist in a Signaling System" (free full text)

2. "Underwater 'sniffing' by semi-aquatic mammals"

Happy Holidays!

UPDATE 12/26: Forgot to mention yesterday that I also talk about the dishonesty article on this week's edition of the Times Science podcast.

Tags
Brains

More like this

Learn to smell underwater with the star-nosed mole
Sniffing brings molecules in the air around us into our nose, where they are detected and manifested in our brains as smells. But try the same trick underwater and you would rapidly choke or drown. Nonetheless, smell is a tremendously important sense for most mammals and at least two species…
The star-nosed mole's amazing appendages
THIS weird and wonderful creature is the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata), a small, semi-aquatic mammal which inhabits the low wetlands of eastern North America. Like other moles, it ekes out an existence in a network of narrow underground tunnels, and digs shallow surface tunnels where it…
A Fossil Fetus and what it can tell us about the life history of early whales.
An article published tonight in the journal PLoS ONE is forcing scientists to rethink everything they thought they knew about whale evolution. OK. That's not actually true. But I've got a bet going that "someone" is going to use the phrase "rethink everything" in their story about this find, so…
Surprises in Jelly
Ive got an article in todays New York Times about jellyfish and their kinknown as cnidarians. Cnidarians look pretty simple, which helped earn them a reputation as simple and primitive compared to vertebrates like us, as well as insects, squid, and other creatures with heads and tails, eyes, and…

Unrelated, but your friend Toxoplasma gondii pops up again at http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20975555-1702,00.html

A COMMON parasite can increase a women's attractiveness to the opposite sex but also make men more stupid, an Australian researcher says.

...

"Interestingly, the effect of infection is different between men and women,'' Dr Boulter writes in the latest issue of Australasian Science magazine.

"Infected men have lower IQs, achieve a lower level of education and have shorter attention spans. They are also more likely to break rules and take risks, be more independent, more anti-social, suspicious, jealous and morose, and are deemed less attractive to women.

"On the other hand, infected women tend to be more outgoing, friendly, more promiscuous, and are considered more attractive to men compared with non-infected controls.

"In short, it can make men behave like alley cats and women behave like sex kittens''.

When will we see a male only cure?

Carl wrote:

" 'One of the things I would guess right off the bat is that there's some sort of carefully controlled valve to keep it from inspiring water,' Dr. Catania said. 'The timing and the behavior is probably carefully controlled as well. But the evolution of these minor adaptations does not seem to be a huge leap.' "

Minor adaptations?

ROFLMAO!!!!! Once again, ideology trumps science.

Is there no limit to the human mind's ability to deceive itself?

Hey Carl - Happy New Year!
Enjoyed the lying frog and it brought to mind my favorite deceptive bug, the Photuris firefly, which does the "mating blink" of a different genus of firefly in order to attract and then eat the males.
Cheers,
Stan

The article is interesting, but I'm put off by the gratuitous political swipe in the illustration (not that Carl necessarily had anything to do with it). Is putting Clinton in with Nixon supposed to be some kind of "balance"? Sorry, Clinton is not in the same world of deception as Nixon, Iago, Machiavelli, or Clifford Irving. Unlike Nixon, or Bush for that matter, his lies weren't in the service of killing people.

Sorry, to be clear: I mean the first article, as it appeared in print.