At last, some science behind the Superorganism concept

Figure 1. Relationship between normalized metabolic rate and body mass for unitary organisms and whole colonies (from Hou et al 2010)

The notion that insect colonies and their constituent individuals are analogous to multicellular organisms and their constituent cells has been a controversial idea for decades. Is it useful, for example, to think of an ant colony as a single individual? Do superorganisms really exist as coherent entities? Or do insect colonies function more as aggregations of individuals?

Last week, PNAS published the first application of empirical methods to test the superorganism concept. This is a significant paper. The researchers, led by Chen Hou, asked whether the set of relationships between mass, energy, and reproduction that govern multicellular organisms show the same patterns when measured across whole insect colonies.

The answer, in most cases, was a resounding Yes: social insect colonies grow and breathe just like regular organisms.

source: Hou, C., Kaspari, M., Vander Zanden, H. B., Gillooly, J. F. 2010. Energetic basic of colonial living in social insects. PNAS early edition.

More like this

The mighty insect colonies of ants, termites and bees have been described as superorganisms. Through the concerted action of many bodies working towards a common goal, they can achieve great feats of architecture, agriculture and warfare that individual insects cannot. That's more than just an…
In a recent post, Dr. Dolittle reviewed some of our recent findings about the metabolic rate of ant colonies. We focused on the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus, a species with wide geographic distribution across the southwestern United States: If you are interested, there is a large…
The research of James Waters and Jon Harrison from Arizona State University on ant metabolism was recently featured in a press release from The American Physiological Society. Mr. Waters and Dr. Harrison have measured the standard metabolic rates of individual ants as well as whole ant colonies.…
Rob Wilson has a new entry up at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, entitled "The Biological notion of an individual". It discusses an interesting problem, one that goes back to discussions by Julian Huxley in 1911. What is an individual in biology? The term "individual" means,…

One might also wonder, given Hou et al.'s results, why ants and termites are still so dang abundant and (bio)massive? I have an idea .

Yes, it is a shameless plug. No, I'm not ashamed of myself (at least not for this).

By Joshua King (not verified) on 09 Feb 2010 #permalink

Oops, no linking allow. I forgot. Oh well.

By Joshua King (not verified) on 09 Feb 2010 #permalink

Cool- thanks for pointing out Josh. I'd not seen it- looks highly relevant.

I saw that last week...pretty cooooooooool.

By ihateaphids (not verified) on 09 Feb 2010 #permalink

As opposed to a single social insect. A social insect colony in some respects behaves more as a single organism than does a single worker ant.

For example, a worker ant invests almost no energy in reproductive organs. If we were to plot it in a regression of mass versus reproductive investment among solitary organisms, the ant would be an extreme outlier. Same for a queen ant that puts relatively more mass into reproduction than solitary organisms of her same mass.

Only when the workers and queens are considered together as a colony does the scaling relationship resemble that of nonsocial organisms.