The Shakespeared brain

Shakespeared_brain.jpg

In the July issue of the magazine Literary Review, Philip Davis discusses the effect of William Shakespeare's use of language on cognitive function.

Davis, a professor of English at the University of Liverpool, and editor of The Reader is working with psychologist Guillaume Thierry and cognitive neuroscientist Neil Roberts to explore how the brain responds to a linguistic trick called functional shift, or word-class conversion, in which the structure of a sentence is changed so that one part of speech (say a noun) is transformed into another (such as a verb).

Functional shift was often employed by the Bard - for example, when he wrote "lip something loving into my ear," or when a character from The Winter's Tale says that "thoughts would think my blood".

Sentences structured in such a way are linguistically economical, because the meanings in them are compressed, but they also violate the laws of grammar, and are therefore processed somewhat differently from conventionally structured sentences.

Davis and his colleagues have therefore been using electroencephalogram (EEG) to detect the brain wave changes that occur in response to hearing Shakesperian sentences containing a semantic or syntactic violation.

[We found that] while the Shakespearian functional shift was semantically integrated with ease, it triggered a syntactic re-evaluation process likely to raise attention and extra emergent consciousness, and giving more power and sheer life to the sentence as a whole.

In this way Shakespeare is stretching us, making us more alive, at a level of neural excitement...Our findings begin to show how Shakespeare created dramatic effects by implicitly taking advantage of the relative independence - at the neural level - of semantics and syntax in sentence comprehension. It is as though he is a pianist using one hand to keep the background melody going, whilst simultaneously the other pushes towards ever more complex variations and syncopations.

These experiments are ongoing, but some of the initial findings were published in the journal Neuroimage back in January. The paper is available as a PDF, which causes Firefox 3 to crash, but can be downloaded in Internet Explorer, or by right-clicking in Firefox and selecting "Save Link As...".

(Via 3QD)

More like this

Shakespeare bent language in peculiar ways. He had a habit of violating our conventional grammatical categories, so that nouns became verbs and adjectives were turned into nouns. (This is known as a functional shift.) Here's Phillip Davis: Thus in "Lear" for example, Edgar comparing himself to the…
Ambiguity is a constant problem for any embodied cognitive agent with limited resources. Decisions need to be made, and their consequences understood, despite the probabilistic veil of uncertainty enveloping everything from sensory input to action execution. Clearly, there must be mechanisms for…
To what extent is music like language? Previously, I've reviewed how music and language share semantic characteristics, at least insofar as similar scalp electrical activity follows incongruent musical passages as follows incongruent words. But is it also possible that music has grammar, just…
I was asked by a reader to take a look at yet another crackpot theory of everything. This time, it's the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe. This one is as cranky as any, but it's actually got some interestingly silly math to it. Stripped down to its basics, the CTMU is just yet another…

I heart Shakespeare!

Shakespare mind for Jason

cute, but what the hell is "extra emergent consciousness"? Also how do we we know how unusual shakespeare's phrasing was for his time? maybe his piano playing is only neurally arousing us generations later.

Just for the record, Epiphany web browser does not crash when downloading the pdf.

Many thanks (& hope you got the books from Amazon.UK that I sent a few months back)