1. principles
  2. Counterfactual Physics Blogging

Counterfactual Physics Blogging

By drorzel on February 27, 2006.

OK, let's say you want to explain something really difficult, like counterfactual computation with quantum interrogation, but you don't want to actually sit down and do all that typing (let's say you have a big stack of lab reports to grade, or something). There's a way to pull this off.

What you do is, you put yourself in a superposition of states in which you explain and don't explain this phenomenon, and then don't touch your blogging software (that would constitute an observation, and collapse your wavefunction) for a day or two. When you come back, you'll find that an explanation has already been posted. With puppies, even.

The Internet is a weird and wonderful thing.

(Update 2/28/06: Scott Aaronson weighs in as well, with a good classical analogue.)

Tags
Physics
Quantum Optics

More like this

Son of "Notes Toward 'Weird Quantum Phenomenon'"
A continuation of the lecture transcription/ working out of idea for Boskone that I started in the previous post. There's a greater chance that I say something stupid about quantum measurement in this part, but you'll have to look below the fold to find out... At the end of the previous post, I…
What Do You Need to Make a Quantum Computer?
(This is the second of two background posts for a peer-reviewed research blogging post that has now slipped to tomorrow. I started writing it, but realized that it needed some more background information, which became this post. And now I don't have time to write the originally intended post...)…
Fearful Symmetry
I've had a chance now to read through the new papers mentioned in the Wolfgang Ketterle post last week, and there's some interesting stuff there. The second item on the list from the AIP news article, "First observation of Mott insulator shells," is particularly interesting, as I did some early…
Quantum Consciousness and the Penrose Fallacy
Over at Neurophilosophy, Mo links to an article by a physicist, posted on the arxiv, that claims to explain visual perceptions using quantum mechanics: A theory of the process of perception is presented based on von Neumann's quantum theory of measurement and conscious observation. Conscious events…

I liked the explanation that went:

John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
Wait 2 minutes
John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
Wait 2 minutes
John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
Wait 2 minutes
John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
Wait 2 minutes
John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
Wait 2 minutes
John Boy: Jason, you asleep?
Jason: No.
{repeat}

Am I the only one who thinks that this is sort of like the Monty-Hall problem? in that in the Monty-Hall problem, Monty collapses the wave vector somewhat by knowing which of the remaining doors has the goat, and showing us that one.

I may be babbling incoherently here.

By Brian Postow (not verified) on 27 Feb 2006 #permalink