The State of Theory

There's a lot of buzz in physics blogdom about the Strings 07 meeting, which starts today in Spain. They currently have a list of speakers, and promise slides and video to come.

Also, there's a new paper by Edward Witten on the arxiv, cue sound of heavenly choirs:

We consider the problem of identifying the CFT's that may be dual to pure gravity in three dimensions with negative cosmological constant. The c-theorem indicates that three-dimensional pure gravity is consistent only at certain values of the coupling constant, and the relation to Chern-Simons gauge theory hints that these may be the values at which the dual CFT can be holomorphically factorized. If so, and one takes at face value the minimum mass of a BTZ black hole, then the energy spectrum of three-dimensional gravity with negative cosmological constant can be determined exactly. At the most negative possible value of the cosmological constant, the dual CFT is very likely the monster theory of Frenkel, Lepowsky, and Meurman. The monster theory may be the first in a discrete series of CFT's that are dual to three-dimensional gravity. The partition function of the second theory in the sequence can be determined on a hyperelliptic Riemann surface of any genus. We also make a similar analysis of supergravity.

It's 82 pages, so I don't expect I'll be reading it any time soon, but if that's your sort of thing... Well, you probably don't need me to tell you that there's a new Witten paper available.

More like this

An off-hand comment in my RHIC post has provided a lot more traffic and entertainment than I would've thought possible, and has also accidentally re-confirmed what we used to call "Furr's Law" back in my Usenet days-- namely, that the fastest way to get information on the Internet is to say…
"It is in the theory of perception that we have established our bond, or the lie I should say, for which we kill. We are nothing without our image. Without our projection. Without the spiritual hologram of who we perceive ourselves to be or rather to become, in the future. When you are lonely, I…
With last week's announcement on new constraints on dark energy models, the blogosphere chatter on dark energy is inching up, in particular The Babe in the Universe is irate and throwing some harsh comments around So... let me give a quick perspective on "dark energy" from the astrophysics side:…
Bret Underwood, a friend of mine from my time in Madison, WI, saw my post on String Theory, and took issue with my statement that it wasn't testable. I'm still standing behind what I said, but let's address what Bret has to say. I donât understand your argument above for why string theory is…

No exercise of ink on paper can withstand a reproducible contrary observation. Theory is vassal to experiment. Two allowed and measurable empirical falsifications of metric gravitation remain:

1) Relativistic spin-orbit coupling in binary pulsar PSR J0737-3039A/B. 20 years of observation.

http://www.oakland.edu/physics/mog29/mog29.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein-Cartan_theory

2) Equivalence Principle violation by identical composition, opposite geometric parity mass distributions. 2 days in an analytical lab. String theory is falsified as BRST invariance dies.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Quick, cheap, sensitive

Bill Gates pledges $40+ billion toward buying a Nobel Peace Prize. $5000 and a weekend could do Physics. At worst it SOP validates GR. Somebody should look.

Just clicked on the arxiv link to verify. Ed Witten is the sole author, yet the abstract begins, "We consider...".

So, is this a Royal 'We' or an Editorial 'We'?

is this a Royal 'We' or an Editorial 'We'?

In Witten's case, it is hard to know. Perhaps it is a new duality?

By Torbjörn Lars… (not verified) on 25 Jun 2007 #permalink

Cool thread. Thanks for the heads up.

Laserprinted the new Witten paper. Carried it around the Caltech campus. First guy who discussed it with me was DINAKAR RAMAKRISHNAN, Professor of Mathematics
[Ph.D., Columbia University, N.Y., 1980;
Research Interests: Number theory, automorphic forms, algebraic geometry, representations of Lie and p-adic groups].

His position was, roughly, we all know that Witten is a great genius, in Math (which may or may not relate to our actual universe) and Physics (which may or may not relate to Math that we understand).

Then he compared this and String Theory to Religion. Then he extolled the virtues of Hindu Mythology as Literature, but questioned the logic of anyone who actually believed it as applying to human life in this specific part of the multiverse.

Then I went off and gave a laserprinted Science Fiction novel manuscript, not by me, about Nanotechnology, already sold (and sequel already sold), to a distinguished professor who does Nanotechnology, in hopes of a sentence for the Press Packet.

C. P. Snow: "The Two Culture" -- demolished twice in an hour at one university campus.