Throwback Thursday: The Story of Mars (Synopsis)

“Mars once was wet and fertile. It’s now bone dry. Something bad happened on Mars. I want to know what happened on Mars so that we may prevent it from happening here on Earth.” -Neil deGrasse Tyson

No, what happened on Mars isn't in any danger of happening here on Earth, despite what your sci-fi horror films might have you believe. We're a long way from becoming a dry, cold, barren desert wasteland like our neighboring world.

Image credit: NASA / Viking Orbiter. Image credit: NASA / Viking Orbiter.

But just because we're not in danger of that doesn't mean that it isn't vitally important to understand what exactly happened on Mars, because -- as it turns out -- Mars wasn't always like this! In fact, there's plenty of evidence to show that early on, Mars was a lot more Earth-like than most people think.

Image credit: Kevin M. Gill of flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinmgill/. Image credit: Kevin M. Gill of flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinmgill/.

What happened? The exciting news is that our leading theory is about to be put to the test! Come find out how.

More like this

"Mars once was wet and fertile. It's now bone dry. Something bad happened on Mars. I want to know what happened on Mars so that we may prevent it from happening here on Earth." -Neil deGrasse Tyson Oh, it's true alright, something bad did once happen on Mars. And although there isn't any real…
“There is a fifth dimension, beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition.” -Rod Serling Of course, despite our best theoretical hopes, we know only of four…
"If you look at the field of robotics today, you can say robots have been in the deepest oceans, they've been to Mars, you know? They've been all these places, but they're just now starting to come into your living room. Your living room is the final frontier for robots." -Cynthia Breazeal Ever…
"Will you or won't you? Should you or shouldn't you? Use this day to do something daring, extraordinary and unlike yourself." -Vera Nazarian The need for a February 29th, once every four years or so, doesn't just give us an extra day this year, but it keeps the calendar from drifting and failing to…

During magnetic field reversals, the Earth's field was much weaker. And there have been thousands of field reversals. The rate of loss per reversal event must be fairly low, otherwise we wouldn't be here. Is this a relevant data point?

By Omega Centauri (not verified) on 05 Dec 2014 #permalink

I am supposing that this implies that there is not only a "Goldilocks" zone in terms of orbital positioning, but one for planetary size as well (and of course, composition); as it pertains to evolving and maintaining life.

By William Hendrixson (not verified) on 05 Dec 2014 #permalink

@Omega #1: Yes, there have been many field reversals. but the transitions take an extremely short time to happen. Studies from the late eighties (see, e.g., http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X89900538) suggest that the reversal process may only take a few decades. Compared to the ~100 kyr to Myr duration of a given field configuration, the atmosphere loss between times must be negligible.

By Michael Kelsey (not verified) on 05 Dec 2014 #permalink

Phil,
Not often I disagree with your comments but on the comment that "water once flowed freely across the Martian surface" is not one that is supported by the surface geochemistry of Mars. Basically, the chemistry of Mars indicates weathering has been isochemical. That is alteration has occurred without changing the chemical composition of the material. A Google search of "Mars + isochemical" will turn up many papers on the subject going back many years. My own favorite data set, reflecting my own area of work, is the lack of variation in the K - Th ratio as seen by the gamma-ray spectrometer on the Odyssey craft. (Incidentally, the moon shows a similar uniform K/Th ratio.) What isochemical alteration implies is that there were low water / rock ratios and insufficient water to allow water transport of soluble cations / anions. An isochemical alteration is also, for example, how one can produce an intimate mixture of the two salts calcium and magnesium sulfate which have solubility products which are nearly 4 orders of magnitude different. Not easy to do otherwise.
I would recommend a read of the recent paper by Halver & Head (Nature Geosci, Nov) which discusses the problem of trying to get a climate model for early Mars in which water would be stable. The water story for Mars is still a long way from being resolved and, IMHO, flowing rivers, lakes oceans are unlikely to play a role.

By Bruce Dickson … (not verified) on 05 Dec 2014 #permalink