Just Science Weekend: Gadid Fish

i-6f5920df52909c8499d7dbf9e8e981d3-images_Cod Fish Fingers.jpg

This is Science Weekend. Any thing you read here should be interpreted within the context of picnics, cartoons, and sushi dinners. The last five days of Science Week featured stories from colleagues contemplating important stuff like sea cucumbers, sediment transport, and blue smokers. It went well. It's good to have new writers. We need more.

To be honest, the "Science Week" challenge caught me off guard. Deep Sea News always writes about science. We never drag on about ourselves. Craig and I are invertebrate biologists interested in the physical and evolutionary processes that maintain deep-sea biodiversity. It's like saying "Let's have Overdrive Week," at Hot Rod Magazine. We barely have time to consider anything but sea spiders, squids, giant isopods, and bubblegum corals. Still, that won't stop either us from telling you about deep-sea fish.

Deep-sea cod (family Gadidae) are "one of the most important families of fishes in the deep-sea". Their deep siblings include pollock and hake. Pollock is used to make fake crab legs in the Subway seafood salad. It's packaged as a strange white Asian boloney caled sarimi. Sarimi fishermen catch pollock with bottom trawls off Alaska, and press the meat into a white pressed sausage stained with bright colors in the sliced meat section at the Vietnamese grocery. Check it out sometime.

Cod fish have been getting a lot of attention in the media because they supposedly harbor the source of a new cure for cancer. This diagnosis is a reprieve, in a way. Cod fish also dominate the global fisheries statistics, accounting for somewhere near 90% of the global fisheries catch. They're obviously delicious. It's like a crime. Hear the death bells toll.

Cod already suffered commercial extinction in the North Atlantic, for example. There's a book about it (called "Cod") showing that historical abundance of cod explains early European migrations, and these migrations are closely tied to cod's demise. Apparently, there is an inverse relationship in marine fisheries between tastiness and survivorship.

Unfortunately, science won't stop people from driving these species to extinction. Culture might, though. I've heard the most recent large scale recovery of groundfish stocks (like cod) occurred in the North Pacific during World War II, when war stemmed the decline of some fish populations because fisheries were restricted. It is ironic that the best chance for cod fish to survive is if they yield the cure for cancer, or a war breaks out.

to be continued tomorrow...

More like this

You can see from yesterday's post and comments that we are tapping into the science of fish baloney. A commenter took offense to my remarks and misspelling of surimi, a processed food product made from pollock. Pollock, hake, and cod are Gadiforms in the families Gadidae and Moridae. Together these…
Score one for Oceana and the New England Fisheries Management Council. Actually, score them fifteen. The two groups recently announced they have laid the foundations for designating 15 deep-sea canyons off the coast of New England as Habitat Areas of Particular Concern in an effort to build a more…
The writers at Deep Sea News are big fans of all things invertebrate. We bend over backwards trying to convince people that deep-sea worms, isopods, anemones, and squid are the coolest animals anywhere on Earth. We stick up our noses at charismatic megafauna like sea turtles and whales, thinking "…
Bathynomus giganteus (Arthropoda: Crustacea: Isopoda: Cirolanidae) You know those cute little roly-poly bugs you found under rocks as a kid? You poke at them and they curl up into a little ball? Well, magnify that times 1000, take away the functional role of the eyes, head to the deep-sea…

You really ought to investigate these subjects before you write about them. It's called SURIMI not sarimi and surimi is only one of the raw materials that go into making analog seafood products such as faux crab legs. Surimi is the minced and washed muscle proteins of fish that have been stabilized with cryoprotectants such as sugars. Harvesters do not make analog food products, rather surimi is the cost effective raw material allowing this high-quality protein to be transported to analog manufacturers - based far from the Bering Sea - while preserving its healthful qualities.

Your obvious disdain for surimi analog products is grounded in ignorance and seems culturally biased. A number of Asian surimi products are truely remarkable. They are as different from the discount warehouse foods you encountered as European patés are from spam. Furthermore, many Asian cuisines focus on sauces to provide flavors while ingredients such as surimi are used for their texture. For many people outside the US, surimi based analogs represent inexpensive and healthful protein sources. Making surimi from fish muscle protein is a cost effective way to preserve the nutritional quality of fish protein for human consumption - while at the same time, using more of each harvested fish for human food.

Furthermore, the BEST way for cod - or any other capture species - to maintain healthy populations is to implement science based fishing regulations that are adhered to - as has been done for Alaskan pollock under the guidance of the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council in Alaska. Because such regulations have been implemented and enforced, the pollock populations off Alaska - the focus of the largest capture fishery on Earth - are robust and the fishery has been certified as sustainable.

By Scott Smiley (not verified) on 10 Feb 2007 #permalink

I worked for a while at a local surimi factory that supplies Subway, among other restaurants. The production process was fascinating, and standards of purity and hygiene were far more strictly adhered to -- by workers at every level -- than they were at the local organic-granola factory where I've also worked. You may not care for the taste or texture of surimi you've eaten in seafood salads in the US, but it's a far cry from "boloney (sic)."

By Suzanne Rebert (not verified) on 10 Feb 2007 #permalink

I cannot believe we are even having this dialogue. I fully support Peter's sentiment. You have to wonder about foods in which we use terms like "analog", "stabilized with cryoprotectants", and "cost effective raw material". It has nothing to due with cultural bias as I reguraly enjoy cuisine far from Arkansas roots. I am equally afraid of all products that are processed and far removed from thier original state.

Oops. Don't get me wrong. I like baloney. That was actually a complement. I also like surimi, and Subway seafood salad sandwiches. Did I say otherwise? I'll try and get to the point tomorrow.

Sorry for the misspelling, Dr. Smiley. No offense.

Peter means to say baloney is a "compliment".

By Maria Montoreano (not verified) on 10 Feb 2007 #permalink

Must one have? I have no current connection with it; I temped in a factory for some extra spending money for a while. I don't know Dr. Smiley, but the reason I watch this blog (and have been for several months) is that I studied marine affairs at the University of Washington in the '90s and am still interested in fish and the oceans.

By Suzanne Rebert (not verified) on 11 Feb 2007 #permalink

JEBCIE SIE CHUJE PIERDOLONEEEE!