Earthquake weather?

OK, I don't actually believe in earthquake weather, but it was really hot today and the house just shook. (I could see the shaking as well as feel it.)

I'm going to check what others are reporting to the USGS. Be right back.

UPDATE: So far, it seems to be a magnitude 4 or so -- a wee temblor. Here's hoping letting off stress like this keeps the ginormous killer earthquakes at bay.

More like this

I'm told we had a moderate earthquake here last night. Indeed, it is reportedly the largest earthquake in the area since the 1989 Loma Prieta quake -- which, as it happens, was the temblor that welcomed me to the San Francisco Bay Area. I completely missed it. You see, I was driving home from the…
One hundred years ago today, 18 April 1906, a major earthquake (estimated to be 7.9 on the richter scale) nearly destroyed the city of San Francisco and did some serious damage to other communities in the area. Here in the Bay Area, there are various commemorations of the event taking place, and…
Hal Lindsey is back with his tried and true lie about the USGS and earthquakes. Writing in - where else? - the Worldnutdaily, he says: My friend Tom Ambrose of WorldNetDaily did a little research on the subject on Monday. He found the three largest-magnitude earthquakes recorded in recent history…
The Worldnutdaily has this piece by Greg Laurie giving the usual "the end is near" screed that we hear after every major disaster. Laurie is a regular WND contributor and is the pastor of one of the largest churches in America, Harvest Christian Fellowship. So naturally, he can be relied upon to…

FriendFeed and Twitter are great - all the info was there within seconds of the earthquake. People-power!

I was sitting here wondering it that was an earthquake. I saw another blogger say it was one and I figured in couldn't have been real big. KQED just reported it was in the east bay, Alamo, which explains why it wasn't that big her in south SJ.
Blinking hot down here too... 102 freaking degrees...

A magnitude of 4 is not very strong. I live in San Francisco and we had just one shake. Having grown up in CA and being used to earthquakes, I didn't bother to check to see what the magnitude was. I was just saying today that I needed to put together a better emergency kit; guess it's time to do that!

Well hell: we can get quakes that big here in Britain and we don't even need some humungous great fault to do it. :-)

"Here's hoping letting off stress like this keeps the ginormous killer earthquakes at bay."

Well, if the magnitude scale goes on powers of ten, and a mag 8 happens every 200 years, then how often do you need a mag 4 for that to happen?

About once a week? (1e-4)

I might consider keeping the good china in the box until I need to use it. Better to have a house to come home to, though. Hope it works.

By Robert Bird (not verified) on 08 Sep 2008 #permalink

The magnitude scale measures energy in powers of ten, but there's no reason to believe that this has any obvious connection to how often such earthquakes occur.

The magnitude scale measures energy in powers of ten, but there's no reason to believe that this has any obvious connection to how often such earthquakes occur.

Well, there's the empirical observation that it is connected - magnitude 5 earthquakes occur 10x less frequently than magnitude 4s.

And since the magnitude scale technically measures energy in powers of 10^(3/2), you're always missing a factor of 20 - it might make a soothing ritual chant to say otherwise, but there is no way that you'll ever have enough small earthquakes to ward off the Big One.