A couple months ago, I wrote a feature for Discover about the intriguing possibility that life might have originated more than once on Earth--and that maybe those alternative life forms were still alive among us today. Paul Davies, one of the scientists who has explored this idea in recent years, has written an account of it that's the cover story of this month's Scientific American. Check it out. Davies offers some neat possibilities, such as the notion that living things might use arsenic instead of phosphorus to store energy. One creature's poison...
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Ask an informed layman what he or she thinks is the greatest science-based industrial discovery or invention of all time and the person will likely name the computer, the transistor, the telephone, the incandescent light or perhaps even the blast furnace. But key as all these inventions were to…
This is an enhanced version (with some upgraded images and text) of an article I first wrote over two years ago. It is just as valid today as it was back then, only today, I have a special offer to go with it. Next week, a bunch of cosmologists and myself are getting together and all writing about…
And it's from Michigan, from a blog that calls itself The Local Area Watch, run by William and Bridget Tingley (who have given each other funny titles like "executive director" and "editor". And they're not too happy with the school board's decision. Darwinism Isn't Science, they declare, and then…
The name "Richard Gallagher" may be familiar to some readers. Gallagher is the editor of The Scientist, and last year, somewhat naively suggested that the evolution/creation "debate" was actually a good thing (you can find the text of his editorial at this site). Both PZ and Jason Rosenhouse took…
I think the most interesting part of the article is the bit about the bacterium that converts right-handed amino acids to left-handed ones. This strongly suggests that the bacterium regularly encounters right-handed amino acids, otherwise it wouldn't have maintained those genes. But all known life produces left-handed amino acids, so where are the right-handed ones coming from? They can't just be floating around in the environment. If they were, the conversion genes would be common in other species of bacteria. So it seem like there must be a source of the right-handed amino acids somewhere.
Is that the same Paul Davies who just had a lame-assed op-ed published in the New York Times?