# Happy Perfect Number Day (Synopsis)

“If everything was perfect, you would never learn and you would never grow.” -Beyoncé

As human beings, we may be far from perfect. Even our mathematical celebrations, like Pi Day, are mere approximations. But there are a few mathematical quantities out there that really are perfect. And today, June 28th, I'd like to share with you a celebration we should all be able to partake in: perfect number day!

Image generated by me.

Most numbers are deficient, in the sense that if you added up all their divisors (other than themselves), you get a number less than the original one you began with. A few of them -- about 24.8% of the countable numbers -- wind up being abundant, or with a number greater than the original one you began with.

Image credit: screenshot from the Wikipedia page on Perfect Numbers, via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number.

But a select few of them -- with only 48 known so far -- are perfect. Go read the whole story of them here!

Tags

### More like this

##### Perfect Numbers
I'll return to my Dawkins series later in the week. But after all our exertions recently trying to resolve the mysteries of the universe, I find myself in the mood for a straight math post. So, inspired by some comments from this post, let's talk about perfect numbers. A number is said to be…
##### Comments of the Week #18: From perfect numbers to quantum uncertainty
“I have no faith in human perfectibility. I think that human exertion will have no appreciable effect upon humanity. Man is now only more active -- not more happy -- nor more wise, than he was 6000 years ago.” -Edgar Allan Poe It's been quite a fun-filled week for thinking about science and the…
##### Monday Math: Euler's Formula for Perfect Numbers
In last week's post, we discussed Mersenne primes. These were primes of the form: $2^p-1, \phantom{x} \textrm{where} \phantom{x} p \phantom{x} \textrm{is prime.}$ I mentioned that such primes are relevant to the problem of finding perfect numbers. So how about we flesh that out? Let's define…
##### Monday Math: Proving Euler's Formula for Perfect Numbers
In last week's post we discussed perfect numbers. These were numbers, like 6, 28 and 496, that are equal to the sums of their proper divisors. We referred to Euler's formula, which claims that every even perfect number has the form $2^{p-1} \left(2^p-1 \right),$ where the term in parentheses…

"It has been proven that all the even perfect numbers that exist are of the form (2^n - 1)"

I think there must be a typo, or other mistake in this sentence, as (2^n-1) seems definitely odd to me. Unless there's a definition of "even perfect number" that I somehow overlooked.

Sorry, that should have read "It has been proven that all the even perfect numbers that exist are of the form that are generated by Mersenne primes that follow (2^n - 1)," and that has been fixed.

Thanks for the catch!