Saturday Shocker: US Trends in Obesity 1985-2005

I was stunned as I scrolled through this short Powerpoint presentation composed by the CDC, published in JAMA over the years. Its a compliation of obesity rates beginning in 1985, going up until 2005. What might be the cause for the surge in obesity rates? Possibly the over-availability of cheap oils and starches, says the International Task Force on Obesity.

Makes this recent news release regarding the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome even more important.

Want better gas miliage? Some suggest shedding the pounds. A new pill from a Belgian group, called Rimonabant, may speed the process.

More like this

Today, the FDA's Endocrinologic and Metabologic Advisory Committee reviews rimonabant, the cannabinoid receptor antagonist developed by Sanofi-Aventis, for recommendations, or lack thereof, as an anti-obesity medication. Rimonabant was approved in Europe for limited cohorts of obese patients, but…
This article struck my eye because all of the literature I was familiar with said the opposite. The authors looked a weight gain in the mother during pregnancy and found that the children of the mothers who gained too much or even normal amounts of weight -- by the existing standards -- were more…
In this post I want to address disease control opportunities for EIS officers, many of which are detailed in "Inside the Outbreaks: One of the first things we learned about on joining the EIS was John Snow's determination that an outbreak of cholera in London was attributable to contamination of…
This entry is cross posted from the the SITN Flash, a bimonthly publication written and edited by Harvard graduate students. You can find my piece, as well as archives of previous articles written by many graduate students at the Science in the News website. In 1985, the Centers for Disease Control…

Obesity on the rise? Makes sense to me. I weigh more than I did in 1985, and I'll bet you do too.

By Mustafa Mond, FCD (not verified) on 28 Oct 2006 #permalink

I don't find it shocking, perhaps only because I have been following this trend for a while. I do find it many other things, however: frightening, sad, a little baffling.

I've taught in a summer theatre program for the past 4 years and the things that kids spend their time on now-a-days is quite different (obviously). It is sometimes difficult to get the students to go outside or get off their rears and do something physical (even if it was related to class). they would much rather sit and play PS2, or sit and text-message friends, or sit and watch DVDs.

Lots of sitting going on. Now, I also sit some, but I'm old, and I still sit less than I do anything else. Strengthening this culture of sitting, a school in Attleboro, MA has outlawed tag at recess. Wouldn't want to create any activity that might lead to litigation or some such non-sense.

Very unlikely to be any connection (though I'd want to get definite word on it), but the rise in obesity rates coincides fairly well with the introduction of growth hormones as feed supplement in large-scale farming in the US, and we do know there's still traces of it in the slaughtered meat.

I kind of wonder if having a steady diet on such meat and thus constantly dosing yourself with very small amounts of growth hormone could possibly exacerbate the trend of increasing body weight? My own gut reaction is that the doseage is much too small to make any difference even when taken near-daily, but it would be nice to know it for a fact.

Mustafa,
Unless that picture on the previous post was from a long time ago, I would bet that Shelley has gained a LOT of weight since 1985...like a whole body's worth.

They're on to my subtle humor.

By Mustafa Mond, FCD (not verified) on 30 Oct 2006 #permalink